Talk:Dramatis personae

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Star Wars

this seems to be an encyclopedic entry, and therefore I question whether or not the starwars dramatis personæ reference, without verification or citation should be allowed to stay... I0.antichrist 17:54, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be mentioned that it is used in novels... Although the Star Wars novels are the only one's I have seen it in, to be fair. Hmm... Beeurd (talk) 17:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Many other novels than Star Wars ones have a DP. Examples include Malazan Book of the Fallen, Horus Heresy and Kushiel's Legacy. SpectrumDT (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly is this in use in English since 1730 if Shakespeare used it back in 1623? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.5.59.140 (talk) 01:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC) ABSOLUTELY AGREE. I can find no evidence that the term appears in the First Folio. Cite this statement or delete it. Sebum-n-soda (talk) 17:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:25, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dramatis personæ → Dramatis personae – Usual spelling, e.g. dictionaries such OED and Webster's spell it thus; also in plays, like the lead image of the page, the print often has "Dramatis Personae", not "Dramatis Personæ". Francis Schonken (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this subsection with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support. Nobody uses the ligature anymore unless consciously trying to evoke old-timey printing. A quick check of Google books showed 10/10 sources just using "dramatis personae", and that includes works from the mid-1800s. SnowFire (talk) 16:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even the image used for the article doesn't use that format, so I'll just leave it at that._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:12, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.